As scientists around the globe wage war against a novel, deadly virus, one University of Colorado Boulder lab is working on new weapons to battle a different microbial threat: a rising tide of antibiotic-resistant bacteria which, if left unchecked, could kill an estimated 10 million people annually by 2050.
"The COVID-19 situation is definitely putting us at risk for increasing resistance to antibiotics, so it's more important now than ever that we come up with alternative treatments," said Corrie Detweiler, a professor of molecular, cellular and developmental biology who has spent her career seeking those alternatives.
In a recent paper published in the journal PLOS Pathogens, Detweiler and her research team unveil their latest discovery—a chemical compound that works with a host's innate immune response to push past cellular barriers that help bacteria resist antibiotics.
Along with their other recently published discoveries, the authors say, the finding could lead to a new arsenal for fighting what could be the next big public health threat.
"If we don't solve the problem of finding new antibiotics or somehow making old antibiotics work again, we are going to see sharply increasing deaths from bacterial infections we thought we had beaten decades ago," said Detweiler. "This study offers a totally new approach and could point the way toward new drugs that work better and have fewer side effects."
In the United States alone, 35,000 people die annually from bacterial infections that could not be treated because they've grown resistant to existing drugs. Countless others suffer life-threatening bouts with once-easily treatable illnesses like strep throat, urinary tract infections, and pneumonia. By 2050, the authors note, there could be more deaths from antibiotic resistance than from cancer.
"As our existing antibiotics adapt and work less, we risk essentially going back to a period 100 years ago, when even a minor infection could mean death," said Detweiler.
The coronavirus pandemic has shone even more light on the problem, she notes, as many patients die not from the virus itself but from hard-to-treat secondary bacterial infections.
Meanwhile, she and other scholars worry that heightened use of antibiotics to prevent or treat those secondary infections, while at times necessary, may be exacerbating resistance.
Most antibiotics in use today were developed in the 1950s, and pharmaceutical companies have since scaled back on research in the field in favor of more profitable ventures.
To feed the pipeline, Detweiler's lab developed a technique called SAFIRE for screening for new small molecules that work differently than older drugs.
Of 14,400 candidates screened from a library of existing chemicals, SAFIRE identified 70 that hold promise.
The new paper centers around "JD1," which appears to be particularly effective at infiltrating Gram-negative bacteria.
With a tough exterior membrane that prevents antibiotics from accessing the cell, and another interior membrane providing a buffer, these bacteria (including Salmonella and E. coli) are inherently difficult to treat.
But unlike other drugs, JD1 takes advantage of the host's initial immune assault on that outer bacterial membrane, then slips inside and goes after the inner membrane too.
"This is the first study to show that you can target a Gram-negative bacteria's inner membrane by exploiting the innate immune response of the host," Detweiler said.
In laboratory and rodent experiments, JD1 reduced survival and spread of Gram-negative bacteria called Salmonella enterica by 95 percent.
But while it damaged the bacterial cell membranes, it couldn't penetrate the fine layer of cholesterol that lined its mammalian host's cell membranes.
"Bacteria are vulnerable to JD1 in a way that our cells are not," said Detweiler, noting that for this reason, side-effects would likely be minimal.
Further studies are underway to explore JD1 and other compounds like it.
Meanwhile, Detweiler has formed a spin-off company to help commercialize other compounds that work by inhibiting pumps, called "efflux pumps," that bacteria use to pump out antibiotics.
"The reality is, evolution is way smarter than all of the scientists put together and these bacteria will continue to evolve to resist what we throw at them," she said. "We cannot rest on our laurels. We have to keep feeding the pipeline."
- This press release was originally published on the CU Boulder Today website