Today's Clinical Lab - News, Editorial and Products for the Clinical Laboratory
Clinician examining a breast mammogram.
HER2-positive tumors are uncommon, making up less than one-fifth of all new breast cancer diagnoses.
istock, Radovanovic96

Is It Time for HER2-Low Breast Cancer?

Evaluating the evidence for, and against, distinguishing between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancers

Photo portrait of Michael Schubert, PhD
Michael Schubert, PhD
Photo portrait of Michael Schubert, PhD

Michael Schubert, PhD, is a veteran science and medicine communicator. He holds graduate degrees in biochemistry and molecular biology with a research focus on chromatin structure and function and has written on subjects from subspeciality pathology to fictional science. In addition to writing and editing, he is co-director of the Digital Communications Fellowship in Pathology and Course Trainer at the Lightyear Foundation, an initiative aimed at making science accessible to all.

ViewFull Profile
Learn about ourEditorial Policies.
Published:Aug 07, 2024
|2 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00

Inevitably, when a patient is diagnosed with breast cancer, their HER2 status is evaluated. The current definition, most recently updated in 2023, considers patients HER2-positive when their HER2 status is 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (ISH) analysis and HER2-negative when the status is 0 or 1+. (A status of 2+ is considered “equivocal” and requires further evaluation.) HER2-positive tumors are uncommon, making up less than one-fifth of all new breast cancer diagnoses.

Many HER2-positive tumors are treated with trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody that works by blocking the HER2 receptor to inhibit cell replication, suppressing angiogenesis, and driving cytotoxic action against the cancer cells. Until recently, HER2-negative tumors were not treated with trastuzumab due to their lack of HER2 receptor overexpression. However, the 2023 update to the HER2 testing guidelines approved the use of the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with metastatic cancer and HER2 IHC status 1+ or 2+. The extended approval was based on a clinical trial that showed significant survival gains when treating these patients with trastuzumab deruxtecan.

A recent editorial published in the journal Oncotarget evaluates the currently available data and poses the question: should a new prognostic distinction be drawn between HER2-low (IHC 1+/2+, ISH negative) and HER2-zero (IHC 0, ISH negative) tumors? To reach a conclusion, the authors retrospectively examined a cohort of 410 HER2-negative patients who received no adjuvant systemic treatment. Those classified as HER2-low experienced significantly higher rates of disease-free and overall survival than their HER2-zero counterparts. Results from other studies varied, however; although some confirmed the prognostic value of the HER2-low status, others found no significant differences after controlling for confounding factors.

Although the authors ultimately concluded that it would currently be premature to establish HER2-low status as a separate diagnostic entity, they emphasized the need for more investigation into the designation’s prognostic relevance and diagnostic reproducibility in the lab.